Analysis of Cheshire Musing
Prose and its narrative
the lazy alternative
Words most abundant
meaning defined
Declarative function
it reads codependent
As poets but smile
— with language refined
(Saint David’s Pennsylvania: May, 2024)
| Scheme | AABC XBXC X |
|---|---|
| Poetic Form | |
| Metre | 101100 0100100 11010 1001 110 111 11011 11001 1100101 |
| Closest metre | Iambic trimeter |
| Characters | 211 |
| Words | 32 |
| Sentences | 1 |
| Stanzas | 3 |
| Stanza Lengths | 4, 4, 1 |
| Lines Amount | 9 |
| Letters per line (avg) | 19 |
| Words per line (avg) | 3 |
| Letters per stanza (avg) | 57 |
| Words per stanza (avg) | 10 |
Font size:
2 fans
Citation
Use the citation below to add this poem analysis to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Cheshire Musing" Poetry.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 10 Jun 2024. <https://www.poetry.com/poem-analysis/186736/cheshire-musing>.
Powered by CITE.ME
Discuss this kurt philip poem analysis with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In